• ผู้สร้าง
    กระทู้
  • #110324 Reply
    Nichaphat
    ผู้เยี่ยมชม

    ไปพบแพทย์ที่รพ.มาแล้วค่ะ แต่ไม่บอกผลctเลยค่ะ ให้ยารักษาแผลในกระเพาะมาทาน ช่วยดูผลให้หน่อยค่ะว่าผิดปกติไหมคะ

    CT KUB(44502) CT KUB ( non contrast) History : rlo urinary tract stone No comparison study The serial CT KUB was performed with no contrast injection. Visceral parenchyma cannot be evaluated due to non-contrast study. The study reveals a 0.4 cm. calcification in right side of pelvic cavity (at sacrum level), possibly phlebolith. Few calcifications posteroinferior to right UVJ, size up to 0.3 cm., possibly phlebolith. Large amount of content in marked dilated stomach, Suspicious narrowing of aortomesenteric angle (15 degree) and reduced aortomesenteric distance about 8 mm. with luminal narrowing at 3rd part of duodenum, that cannot excluded SMA syndrome, please clinical correlation or further investigation. No abnormal calcification along visualized urinary tract. No hydronephrosis is detected. Renal size and contour are unremarkable. Both ureters are not dilated. Uterus is not enlarged. Both adnexae appear unremarkable. The urinary bladder is normally distended without stone or mucosal mass. No lymphadenopathy is observed. No free fluid, abnormal mass, cyst or collection is seen. Visualized liver, pancreas, spleen and adrenal glands are intact. IMP: Limitation due to non-contrast study No abnormal calcification along visualized urinary tract. A0.4 cm, calcification in right side of pelvic cavity (at sacrum level), possibly phlebolith. :Few calcifications posteroinferior to right UVJ, size up to 0.3 cm., possibly phlebolith. Large amount of content in marked dilated stomach. Suspicious narrowing of aortomesenteric angle (15 degree) and reduced aortomesenteric distance about 8 mm. with luminal narrowing at 3rd part of duodenum, that cannot excluded SMA syndrome, please clinical correlation or further investigation.

ตอบกลับไปยัง: ผล ct scan มีอะไรผิดปกติไหมคะ
ข้อมูลของคุณ:




Subscription

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Ask the Expert Close